Year: 2021

The Sentinel Effect: 4 Ways Transparency Drives Better Business Outcomes

Ever grabbed an extra cookie from the cookie jar as a kid because you knew no one was watching? Or maybe you skipped out on your last set of reps during a workout because, hey, who’s going to know? 

Sure, we’ve all been guilty of cutting corners when we know there are no consequences. But did you ever attempt to take that cookie with a parent in the kitchen? We’re guessing you probably wouldn’t risk losing precious screen time over one cookie. 

That reaction – not going for the cookie when your parent was right there – is commonly known as the “Sentinel Effect”. The tendency for one’s performance to improve when they know they are being monitored can be observed in all walks of life, both at home and on the job.

The simple act of monitoring – even without applying penalties – is proven to improve behavior. It’s a great passive management technique: show someone you’re monitoring them, and regardless of whether you are actually watching or not, performance will improve. 

This is especially true when managing outside counsel. Historically outside counsel has operated without the oversight – or even visibility – of their clients. That lack of transparency fostered a situation where not only were guidelines consistently ignored, but sloppy business practices were allowed to fester. 

But how do you transparently monitor outside counsel to create the Sentinel Effect? 

The answer is simple — data. All the answers you need are right there in your billing invoices; you just have to know how to use it to create not only a feeling of increased accountability but also to stoke that competitive drive within every lawyer. 

Armed with data, in-house teams have the power to:

1. Enhance Law Firm Relationships

Law firms are retained to act in the best legal interest of the clients, but when it comes to billing, firms are still businesses and can be self-serving. The relationship becomes one-sided as clients are often left as idle price-takers while firms receive hefty paydays. 

Having regular meetings with law firms fueled by a variety of quantitative and qualitative metrics, such as billing rates, discounts, and more, will lead to more effective, robust conversations about what’s working well or where adjustments might be needed. By letting the data do the talking, the conversation is much easier – and clients get better results from their firms. 

Simple practices such as incorporating firm report cards and quarterly business reviews to regularly discuss KPIs serve as a reminder to your law firms that you’re closely monitoring the value the relationship delivers. Nobody likes a “gotcha” moment, so these regular check-ins can help quickly correct firms’ course of action, leading them to become more disciplined in their billing practices and act as a strategic business partner.

2. Eliminate Inefficiencies

From overstaffing to partners handling associate-level tasks, and everything in between, efficiency isn’t always top of mind to law firms. In fact, there’s a strong possibility that the firm that billed the most hours in your panel may actually be the most inefficient.

Inflated invoices are often the byproduct of inefficiency. But transparency on key metrics, like average partner hours, matter duration, or cost can quickly highlight where inefficiencies rack up the cost of your matters.

Examining and discussing these key metrics with your firms regularly shows that you’re analyzing their efficiency and comparing them to other – potentially more efficient – firms. Your firms don’t want to lose your business, so expect a material boost in productivity and the elimination of inefficient practices. Once you show you’re serious about evaluating performance – and value efficiency – managing your outside counsel effectively will be much easier. By using data to set transparent expectations, you provide a clear roadmap to a stronger relationship. 

3. Influence Strategic Decisions

To effectively manage spend you need to think strategically — and to truly think strategically, you need data. Corporate legal departments are increasingly demanding transparency around everything from rates to work allocation to the diversity of timekeepers and more. But visibility isn’t the only thing that data provides.  

Armed with apples-to-apples comparisons and data-backed insights, corporate legal departments can take a more informed, strategic approach towards the major decisions that impact their department and the business. 

For example, as COVID-19 rapidly accelerated the need to optimize spend and cut costs, many corporate legal departments began to reevaluate their outside counsel spend. Many departments needed to quickly review their rates and obtain rate freezes and discounts from their firms. In turn, this forced competitive firms to follow suit. 

4. Drive Down Costs & Increase Savings

Pricing is arguably the most critical part of any business – product or service. By its very nature, pricing is complicated. “Pricing tricks” are a fact of life – that’s true if you’re pricing sneakers or legal services. 

Now, it’s no secret that law firms use “pricing tricks” – some more above-board than others – on both rates as well as in the manifestation of those rates; their invoices. From block billing to unapproved rate increases to footing the bill for printing, there’s no doubt you’ve fallen victim to unnecessary costs. But the good news is that you have the power to change this narrative. 

By leveraging data to track the performance of your panel firms, you can easily identify the common law firm antics driving up your spend and address them quickly. Using data to show a pattern will, almost miraculously, make certain antics disappear. You may have to negotiate or address other patterns by changing your billing guidelines. Nonetheless, data is your launchpad for not just identifying those antics, but for actioning solutions to them (clawbacks and markdowns, anyone?). 

It’s pretty clear that transparency in business – legal or otherwise – has the power to influence performance and drive better outcomes.

But, you don’t have to take our word for it! One of Bodhala’s clients, a major insurance carrier, was having issues with their panel firms consistently exceeding budget on corporate matters. Prior to starting a very large matter merger, the organization’s in-house team worked with Bodhala to create report cards to share with the top firms in their panel. After receiving a detailed analysis of their performance from the insurance carrier, each firm immediately brought down their budget projections significantly.

Without data, you’ll be hard-pressed to hold your law firms accountable for the quality of service you expect. Data sets the foundation for a successful, equitable partnership in which you receive the value you pay for. 

So, will you continue to turn your back on the cookie jar or will you leverage data to drive better business outcomes?

Get in touch with our team of legal billing and data experts to find out how Bodhala can transform your legal department.

Harness the Power of AI in Operations Management for Corporate Legal Departments

By now, businesses across all sectors recognize the benefits of legal AI in operations management – especially for processes such as contract management. Along with other technologies, AI is helping to reduce the financial pressure on operations teams and corporate legal departments who need to find ways to be more efficient. Particularly in the past year with the pandemic demands, there have been significant investments to decrease workloads for employees across businesses by streamlining things like workflow and approval processes. For example, this study found that contract AI in legal departments can increase efficiency by more than 50%.

In the first installment of our three-part blog and podcast series published earlier this month, we touched on AI’s ABCs. Now, we take a more in-depth look at some fantastic ways AI for operations is powering corporate legal departments. (You can find the podcast of this by scrolling down.)

Pushing Past the Buzz: Is It Really AI?

There’s no disputing that AI is a hot commodity now and a buzzword you hear often. AI in operations management and for legal teams is no exception. While you think your organization may be using it, you may be surprised. In reality, it can be challenging to identify, as AI in legal operations in day-to-day practice doesn’t always look like the images of AI we might have in our heads.

There are five ways to determine if you have an AI-driven system in place.

  1. Use of an interactive system – A fundamental cornerstone of AI is the ability to interact with your system more conversationally through the concept of a virtual agent.
  2. A wizard powered by learning to guide users – AI-enabled wizards lead users to the right workflows and tools, such as contract templates. This is based on learning from previous contract requests to offer more interactive guidance for your staff.
  3. Identification – Semantic analysis by AI can find patterns in related words relevant to an issue and then applies appropriate tags. This AI enabled semantic analysis is frequently used to identify issues in contracts, for example.
  4. Advanced analytics – AI builds off the identification process and allows you to utilize the identified terms very quickly by providing actionable recommendations for tasks.
  5. Robotic Process Automation (RPA) – RPA can be used for approval of changes, not only in workflow but to help your system streamline the approval process by learning from decisions made in prior cases. Essentially, you’re changing the workflow based on past learning and providing recommendations to approvers based on previous actions.

Corporate legal departments vary widely in their current technology levels, so you may not see all of these hallmarks in your organization. Nonetheless, if you can do any (or all) of the things listed above, you’re currently using AI. The next question is how to ensure you’re fully taking advantage of it.

The Benefits of AI in Legal Operations

AI has significant impacts on lawyer productivity. Onit recently conducted a study of legal AI contract review software to see how it affected in-house lawyers’ productivity. The results showed that new users were immediately 34% more efficient and 51.5% more productive. Team leaders could reallocate 15% of their time from contract work and team management to higher-value activities if they use AI in operations.

Consider those results in the context of a typical midsize company that has 28 lawyers and reviews 4,850 contracts annually. With 51.5% more productivity, that same team of 28 lawyers could process 2,498 additional contracts each year. That’s the equivalent of adding nine lawyers to the team. The additional capacity could also reduce costs and free up lawyers to perform higher-value functions to support the business.

The benefits of legal AI don’t stop with productivity. Legal departments must have access to data, and AI for operations allows departments to combine data from all corporate data sources. AI can also flag suspect transactions or questionable third-party relationships and quickly assess their risk level. Having a value chain of data with an intelligence layer around it is essential. Being able to connect that intelligence layer to your legal operations is crucial.

Listen to the Podcast Now: Contract AI in Legal Operations

For a more in-depth discussion of AI enabled contract management and its importance for legal operations, you can listen to the entire podcast interview below.

In our third and final installment of this blog series coming next week, we’ll dive into some of the most useful forms of AI being used in business today.

 

Looking to Control Legal Spend? Don’t Forget These Enterprise Legal Management Features

When it comes to legal spend, corporate legal departments share a unanimous thought: It’s time to control costs. A recent survey from Gartner showed that the proportion for legal spend for outside counsel has decreased from 50% to 44% since 2018 – a trend predicted to evolve further as the effects of the pandemic influence companies’ priorities.

Before you can right-size legal spend, you have to understand how you’re spending. That’s where an enterprise legal management solution (ELM) comes in. Comprised of legal spend management and matter management, modern ELM solutions no longer land in the “nice to have” category. GCs and legal operations professionals are quickly outgrowing (and getting more and more frustrated with) dated ELM systems with non-intuitive interfaces and limited functionality that cannot meet their business needs.

Six Must-Have Enterprise Legal Management Features You Need Now

ELM solutions give users the tools to analyze legal spend, manage matters, minimize company risk and drive process efficiency, giving legal operations managers the ability to reduce legal spend with surgical precision.

The leading ELM solutions offer several crucial features (outlined here) that can help control costs and increase efficiency – an overall win on multiple fronts. However, here are six additional legal spend management and matter management features to consider when evaluating ELM options.

  1. Flexible Workflow

Corporate legal departments need flexible enough workflows to match business requirements. The workflows also need to be simple enough to manage or change without IT personnel reliance. Different work types, such as matters related to employment, litigation, or mergers, can have their unique workflows. Likewise, workflows change based on participants or collaboration with other departments such as sales, procurement and marketing.

  1. Timekeeper Management

Corporate legal departments need the ability to keep track of authorized timekeepers and rates and do it in one solution. This informs not only legal spend but other essential initiatives such as diversity. (For an example of using technology to drive diversity and inclusion, visit Hack the House and select “Team Diversity” for a demo. They created and deployed an app in less than three weeks.)

  1. Billing Guidelines

When a corporate legal department’s outside counsel spend reaches beyond $100 million, the number, size and amounts of legal bills go beyond manual processing capabilities. Submitted invoices may contain charges that do not comply with billing guidelines. ELM will enforce billing guidelines, automatically flagging or denying payment for suspect charges and supporting legal spend managment.

  1. Reporting and Analytics

When it comes to having insight into reporting, a leading ELM solution will provide you with a dashboard view that makes it easy to analyze invoices, evaluate performance and see trends in matter portfolios, which are vital for understanding and controlling legal spend.

  1. Advanced Security

Each day, news breaks of security breaches. Corporate legal and the law firms they work with are now prime candidates for hacking attempts. Industry-standard security and bank-level encryption ensure billing and matter data remains confidential. A three-pronged approach is optimal: custom-hardened Unix kernels, managed virtual private cloud and continuous firewall monitoring.

  1. Outlook Integration

For years, there has been one cry that continually arises when it comes to technology and communications: Email is dead! However, it remains a highly used tool for knowledge workers such as lawyers and operations professionals. Synchronizing matter information between Outlook and associated matters is a quick way to ensure your ELM information remains up-to-date and eliminates duplicative, manual work.

For more ELM and legal spend inspiration, take a look at the following resources:

 

Onit Achieves Important Milestones in 2020 While Positioned for Growth in 2021

Despite COVID-related complications presented to businesses worldwide, Onit had a successful year. Milestones achieved this year included the launch of an artificial intelligence-powered business intelligence platform and AI contract review, two acquisitions in 30 days, increasing employee headcount by 22% and a market-leading NPS score.

According to Onit CEO and Co-Founder Eric M. Elfman, the credit for these accomplishments goes to the company’s ability to unite behind common goals.

“While Onit faced pandemic-related challenges similar to many other businesses, we succeeded by focusing on what matters most: our customers, innovation and employees,” said Eric M. Elfman, CEO and co-founder of Onit. “I credit the dedication and efforts of our employees for making us even stronger than ever before. We are well-positioned for continued growth in 2021, which has been our trajectory since the founding of the company.”

Acquisitions

In November, Onit acquired McCarthyFinch, reinforcing its innovation strategy by delivering powerful AI-based workflow and business process automation solutions – Precedent and ReviewAI. McCarthyFinch is now the Onit AI Center of Excellence, with a mission to further AI innovation for Onit and SimpleLegal products.

Onit’s second acquisition in 2020, AXDRAFT, expands its contract lifecycle management offerings with document automation technology. AXDRAFT, an independent subsidiary of Onit, offers technology that drafts contracts and other legal documents in less than five minutes.

Additional Milestones in 2020

In 2020, Onit also:

  • Processed more than $5.6 billion in law firm invoices in more than 140 countries
  • Established company operations on five continents
  • Added 93 new customers and more than 330 expansions for existing customers
  • Implemented 90 customers
  • Launched OnitCX, a program dedicated to customer success
  • Won more than 15 awards for fast growth and customer success, including being named on the Inc. 5000 for the fifth consecutive year and the Deloitte Fast 500 for the third straight year and winning the ACC Value Champion award.

In 2021, the company will continue to build on its success by capitalizing on the lessons learned during this pandemic and new technologies, including artificial intelligence and document automation to increase growth.

To learn more, read our 2020 milestone press release.

Join Onit at Legalweek(year) for a Discussion on Contract AI  

Onit is excited to continue its momentum in February with a presentation and virtual exhibition at Legalweek(year) 2021.

Experts from Onit and Adobe will present “The Potential Impact of AI on Managing Contracts” during the conference. The CLE-eligible session, scheduled for Tuesday, February 2, at 3:45 p.m. EST, features a discussion on how AI and automation can address contract management challenges. Speakers include:

  • Stasha Jain, Vice President of Legal and Compliance for Onit
  • Nick Whitehouse, General Manager of the Onit AI Center of Excellence
  • Jean Yang, Vice President of the Onit AI Center of Excellence
  • Letitia Hsu, CIPP/US, Associate Legal Counsel, Adobe Inc.

To register for Legalweek(year) and attend the session, visit here.

Onit will also host a series of demonstrations of its AI and automation technologies during Legalweek. From February 2-4, attendees can view demonstrations of the Onit’s Precedent AI platform, Enterprise Legal Management, Contract Lifecycle Management and Legal Service Request. Email [email protected] for more information on the schedule or to set up an appointment.

We look forward to seeing you at Legalweek(year)!

Empower Legal Operations Automation with the Best CLM Tools

The right legal contract lifecycle management (CLM) solution is a crucial component of your legal ops toolbox.

When you work in legal operations, you’re required to wear a lot of hats. On any given day, you’ll work closely with general counsel as well as business stakeholders at all levels of your company. Legal operations is key in creating processes and practices that improve the day-to-day efficiency and effectiveness of the company’s legal team and, in turn, the company as a whole. Contracts are the lifeblood of corporate legal departments, and having tools to manage them is critical to the efficiency legal ops is trying to achieve.

Contract Lifecycle Management in Day-to-Day Legal Operations

It’s nearly impossible to think about legal operations without thinking about contracts. On a daily basis, you’re requesting and drafting contracts, monitoring their progress and obtaining signatures. On top of that, you’re responsible for implementing tools to streamline your organization’s legal practices, developing and enforcing processes and policies to manage outside counsel usage and spend, assisting with budget matters and optimizing workflows within the legal department, and managing the design, rollout and training for new systems – just to name a few things.

With that many important roles on your plate, monitoring contracts doesn’t need to be taking up any more of your time than it has to. With the right tool for managing your contracts from start to finish, you’ll be freed up to focus on tasks that are more critical to boosting efficiency and creating value for the organization.

Finding the Right CLM Solution

As is the case with most legal technology these days, there’s no shortage of options when it comes to choosing a contract lifecycle management solution. In making your choice, it’s important to keep in mind the pain points you’re trying to address in legal operations and the functionalities you want to achieve from your new tool.

Among the biggest challenges that legal ops professionals tend to face when it comes to CLM are:

  • Having a lack of visibility into where your deals stand, who’s responsible for them and what the next steps are at any given time
  • Having no easy way to keep contract drafting and negotiation moving forward
  • Needing an effective way to reduce risk and improve governance
  • Needing to accelerate contract turnaround time while also reducing costs
  • Having no means of self-service, and instead having to rely on others to handle contracts

The ideal CLM tool will serve as a single point of truth for all your contract data, allowing you to standardize your processes and increase efficiency through automation. You’ll have real-time insight into where each contract stands and who might be holding it up, so you can nudge them along and keep everything moving smoothly. CLM solutions also allow you to easily find contracts and have visibility into your renewal and amendments cycles without overwhelming you with information – the best tools allow you to see only the information you need to see, when you need and want to see it.

Implementing CLM in Legal Ops

Legal operations professionals are no strangers to developing, implementing, and using today’s most cutting-edge legal tech solutions. Using technology to manage contracts should be no exception. CLM tools help bolster the practice of corporate law, streamlining the contractual processes that are so integral to the operation of every legal department, and, indeed, every organization operating today.

Contact us today to learn more about how Onit can help you with end-to-end automation of your entire contract management process.

January Digest: Current Legal Operations Trends and Industry News

From COVID to cost-cutting, here are some of the leading industry articles on legal operations trends. This blog post represents a new monthly feature that shares the latest industry news for corporate legal and legal operations professionals.

#1

Legal Ops May Still Struggle for a Seat at the Table in 2021

(source: Legaltech News)

COVID has forced many professions to pivot in how they approach their jobs. Legal operations is no exception. In this article, experts share how 2020 will shape legal operations trends in 2021. Nick Whitehouse, GM of Onit’s AI Center of Excellence, discusses the importance of building smart processes and workflows to remove low-value work from in-house and the growing adoption of AI-enable contract lifecycle management, automated third-party contract reviews and document automation. Roycee Hasuko, director of product engagement for SimpleLegal, advocates for the importance of clean data and systems to convey business priorities and how remote working will require legal ops to continue investments in communications strategies and cross-functional collaboration. You can read the full article here.

#2

Legal departments cut outside spending, focus on managers and specialists, study shows

(source: ABA Journal)

Legal departments have always been under pressure to cut costs, but last year has taken this to unprecedented new levels. The current pandemic has been responsible for the largest part of this pressure. This article examines legal operations trends uncovered by a Gartner survey, highlighting the fact that more legal spending (57%) is staying in-house compared to previous years, participants are expecting reductions in their budgets and 94% say their headcount will remain the same or be reduced. Find the full article here.

#3

Forging Into The Unknown: How COVID-19 Has Already Changed Legal Department Budget Planning

(source: Corporate Counsel)

We always like to maintain a sense of optimism about getting back to normal after the pandemic, and rightfully so. But some believe that things in legal departments will get much more complicated before there’s a return to normalcy. Budgets are the topic of discussion in this article, from opinions on tweaking budgets from previous years,  the role of analytics and “giving smarter haircuts.” The full text of the article is published here.

#4

COVID-19 Proved the Value of Legal Operations In-House

(source: Corporate Counsel)

Despite COVID challenges, many forward-thinking legal ops professionals have made significant strides in finding ways to save money. This article looks at how these individuals have discovered new ways to use their existing technology instead of acquiring additional technology, as well as how they were able to smoothly transition from the office to home. You can read the article here.

#5

Artificial Intelligence Trends Impacting Corporate Legal Departments

(source: Reinventing Professionals)

After ringing in the New Year, it’s that time again to examine current trends in our industry. Ari Kaplan of Reinventing Professionals recently interviewed Nick Whitehouse, general manager of Onit’s AI Center of Excellence. In this thought-provoking interview, they cover several aspects of AI and legal operations trends and how they translate to efficiency and savings for corporate legal. You can listen to the podcast here.

Additional Resources for Legal Trends

If you’re interested in more resources related to legal operations trends, here are some recommendations:

  • To support our customers and colleagues in the legal operations field, Onit offers free Business Continuity Apps to support remote workers and their families that are sheltering at home.
  • Interested in hearing more about how to trim spend? In our Virtual Legal Resourcing Debate with Buying Legal Council, three teams of legal professionals debate different approaches and their pros and cons.
  • In this on-demand webinar, the legal operations team at Pearson shares how they radically transformed how they manage contracts, cutting costs annually by roughly 30%.

We hope you find these articles helpful. We’ll return in February with another industry update on legal operations trends.

How Enterprise Contract Lifecycle Management Software is Changing the Game for General Counsel

Managing risk at an organization is a full-time job, especially for a general counsel (GC) or chief legal officer (CLO). As a company’s chief internal lawyer, they are expected to provide legal advice on a vast range of subjects – legal rights, risk mitigation, compliance with new and existing laws and so much more.

If that weren’t enough, GCs and CLOs are also expected to manage the organization’s legal matters, oversee outside counsel spend, conduct legal research, review internal litigation strategy, and be the ultimate approver and keeper of the organization’s contracts. Despite handling all these critical, sensitive matters, legal departments are often seen as “cost centers” and therefore are forced to do their challenging jobs without all the resources they need to succeed.

Technology, automation and artificial intelligence are key to doing more with less and streamlining processes, particularly when it comes to contracts. Enterprise contract lifecycle management software allows busy lawyers end-to-end control over contracts, freeing up time to focus on other tasks in the process. They can also play pivotal roles in helping corporate legal departments reduce contract management costs. For example, Pearson’s commercial transactions shared service center for more than 10,000 users worldwide achieved a 35% cost reduction and 30% improved contract turnaround time.

Contractual Pain Points

Even the simplest contracts can expose an organization to risk and liability if it’s not handled correctly. GCs and CLOs are tasked with overseeing the crucial job of examining and creating draft agreements, maintaining knowledge of the organization’s operations and legal documents, approving non-standard contract language and more.

Without a centralized solution for managing contracts on an organization-wide basis, legal departments run into countless hurdles, including:

  • Inconsistent language between contracts, often caused by employees using out-of-date contract templates
  • Competing objectives of moving contracts through quickly yet still having enough oversight to effectively manage risk obligations
  • A lack of insight into all the organization’s current contracts
  • An inability to track changes in contracts and ensure that contracts are in compliance with new and existing laws and regulations
  • The risk that contracts might expire or renew without notice because no one’s tracking them
  • Complicated review and approval processes for even standard contracts
  • Manual review and approval processes that create longer contract cycle times
  • Human error and inconsistencies inherent in manual processes, increasing the organization’s risk exposure
  • Lost revenue when add-ons, upgrades and renewals are missed
  • Being seen by other aspects of the business as a barrier to closing deals

The above list is by no means exhaustive. Given the large volume of contracts at today’s modern businesses, the challenges presented by trying to manage those contracts can become overwhelming when you rely on manual processes or basic contract tools that lack automation and AI for general counsel, as well as a means of creating a single source of truth for the organization’s contracts.

The Benefits of Contract Lifecycle Management Tools

While the challenges outlined above may seem daunting, they’re not insurmountable. CLM tools use automation and AI to remove the tedious, manual aspects of traditional contract management, increasing accuracy and efficiency, eliminating errors, and freeing up precious time that GCs and CLOs can use to focus on the many other critical tasks they’re responsible for handling.

Leverage the benefits of contract lifecycle management software to take control of your corporate legal budget and take the headaches out of risk management.

Among other things, the right enterprise contract lifecycle management software will allow you to:

  • Find every contract you need, when you need it
  • Store all your contracts in one cloud location, creating a single source of truth for your organization’s contract data
  • Have full visibility at all times into the status of contract drafting, negotiations, amendments, and renewals, ensuring that nothing’s missed or overlooked
  • Implement uniform templates and playbooks to speed up contract cycle times, reduce manual errors and ensure you’re always using preferred terms
  • Automate approval processes to eliminate bottlenecks
  • Be notified of contract renewals to get a jumpstart on the process
  • Allow for self-service, so that other departments can create standard contracts with the correct language without legal review
  • Improve legal risk management across the organization
  • Improve efficiencies and free up the corporate legal budget for strategic use by automating contract lifecycle management
  • Demonstrate that the legal department is a strategic partner of the business, not a cost center

The ideal CLM tool will give you real-time insights into all phases of the contract lifecycle and provide you with actionable intelligence to make informed decisions for the business. More information means a better ability to identify and control risks across the contract process.

It’s time to take control of your contracts and let contract lifecycle management for general counsel and automation do the heavy lifting for you. Contact us today to learn more about how Onit can help you implement end-to-end CLM for your organization.

Overcoming Law Firm WIP Reporting Challenges

While e-billing has brought new transparency, control, and clarity to the billing process for in-house teams, one criticism of “conventional” e-billing is that the client is still not able to see the time and expenses being charged by their external law firms until the final invoice is sent (whether that is a draft or an engrossed version).

The goal is to be able to see the work carried out and the associated costs during the life of the matter itself and be able to query or even reject items early in the billing cycle. This is necessary for accurate cost control, forecasting, and avoiding invoice surprises. This WIP (Work in Progress) information has long been the subject of discussion between in-house legal teams and law firms. Until recently, law firms have only been able to provide rough estimates of accruals – usually at the end of each month – without any detail.

The key areas that an in-house legal team should be able to monitor to stay in control of its legal spend are:

  • Cost overruns against budget/forecast.
  • Counsel’s pre-billing time entries
  • Large amounts of a single activity (e.g. research, drafting etc.).
  • Wide date ranges between the work carried out and the time/fees submitted to the client.

WIP REPORTING IS BENEFICIAL FOR LAW FIRMS AND CORPORATE LEGAL TEAMS

Modern legal spend management solutions such as Onit’s BusyLamp includes WIP reporting as a key feature. It adds an extra dimension to the relationship between corporate legal teams and their external law firms. Some of the advantages of WIP reporting for both parties include the following:

  • The law firm adds value for the client through enhanced billing data – over and above the provision of quality legal advice.
  • The law firm has confidence that the work performed (so far) has been accepted by the client, and there will be no pushback when presenting the final invoice.
  • The client has more certainty that the work is done correctly and in line with the billing guidelines. Detailed actual spend versus budget can be monitored early in the transaction and through all its phases

CHALLENGES OF WIP REPORTING FOR LAW FIRMS

Despite these benefits, implementing WIP reporting has its challenges. While some law firms have embraced the requests from their clients to provide timely and accurate WIP information, several law firms still need to fully meet the WIP reporting requirement.

A common concern is that firms view the “raw” WIP information as law firm data that the client should not see. Many large international firms have specialist revenue controllers working within the legal teams and closely with the deal partners. These firms also have well-established billing processes, a crucial part involving revenue staff and partners reviewing the WIP for each matter before finalizing the bill. They will decide which items of time to charge. More importantly, they will also check that time narratives are worded appropriately and are suitable for the client’s view.

In most firms, lawyers get advice regarding appropriate content for matter narratives. Still, several hundred associates can work on matters, and it is impossible to “police” what they enter before the bill data is “cleaned up.” The firms are reluctant to go through this cleaning-up process on the WIP data (even though it may be for a small number of bills) as partners see it as doubling up on work. Furthermore, no partner wants to be the first to allow a client to review WIP information in case it contains inappropriate content.

Another reason sometimes quoted by law firms for not wanting to provide WIP revolves around the timing and process issues associated with WIP information. What are the consequences if the client rejects some or all of this information? Some firms argue that if WIP information must be re-submitted, it may fall outside the acceptable time limits between the work done and when it gets billed. These firms often seek to establish reasonable windows and processes for WIP review and resubmission if any line entries are not approved.

A final objection is that producing WIP files in the LEDES e-bill format requires development work to be scheduled by the Finance/IT Systems team. Some firms have implemented manual workarounds for supporting WIP submissions, but this is not sustainable in the long term and for a growing number of invoices.

OVERCOMING WIP REPORTING CHALLENGES

E-billing vendors, in-house legal teams and law firms have together come up with a number of compromises to address these challenges, which include:

  • Line-Item Narratives: If this is a concern, parties may agree to drop narratives from the WIP upload or substitute them with holding text saying that the narratives will be on the final bill. If approved, the clients would at least see costs and the associated activity or expenses based on the LEDES code (e.g., communicating, drafting and so on).
  • Billing Cycles and Accruals: The client can achieve similar output if the billing cycle is reduced to a calendar month, allowing them to view that month’s work. Another option would be to improve the information supplied as accruals. This would not give all the time details to the in-house team but would meet some of the requirements.
  • LEDES Output Requirement: To address the concerns of law firms about possible additional IT development work, Onit has developed two alternative methods used with BusyLamp:
    • Firms can output their WIP information as an Excel spreadsheet, which can then be uploaded into the e-billing application as required by the client. As all law firms have access to Excel as standard and have staff who can use it, the issue of needing expensive billing system changes gets minimized.
    • AI functionality in BusyLamp can extract non-LEDES-format, unstructured WIP data into meaningful and useful reports for the in-house legal team.

For a successful WIP reporting implementation, legal teams should engage with the law firm partners early in the process and discuss the requirement for WIP reporting. This should include why the in-house team requires WIP and what they aim to achieve from tracking it. It will help overcome some of the arguments against providing WIP and help all parties explore suitable alternatives that still give the in-house legal department what they need to succeed.

Request a demo of BusyLamp eBilling.Space today.

WIE KANZLEIEN DIE HINDERNISSE DES WIP-REPORTS ÜBERWINDEN KÖNNEN 

WARUM TRANSPARENZ BEI WORK IN PROGRESS (WIP) SO WICHTIG IST 

Durch die elektronische Rechnungsstellung (eBilling) gewannen Inhouse-Teams neue Transparenz, mehr Möglichkeiten Kosten zu steuern und ein gewisses Maß an Klarheit bezüglich der Abrechnungen. Dennoch blieb ein Kritikpunkt beim “herkömmlichen” eBilling: Fehlende Einblicke in die bisherigen Kosten und erfassten Zeiten auf aktuellen Projekten. Erst nach Erhalt der finalen Rechnung, beziehungsweise eines Drafts, erhielt man einen Überblick. 

Es ist verständlich, dass Mandanten die durchgeführten Arbeiten und die damit verbundenen Kosten bereits während der Laufzeit der Matter verfolgen wollen, um so Positionen frühzeitig im Abrechnungszyklus zu hinterfragen oder sogar ablehnen zu können. Dies ist für eine genaue Kostenkontrolle und -prognose sowie zur Vermeidung von Überraschungen in der Rechnungsstellung notwendig. Diese WIP-Informationen sind schon lange Gegenstand von Diskussionen zwischen Mandanten und Kanzleien. Bis vor kurzem konnten Kanzleien nur grobe Schätzungen der Rechnungshöhe – meist am Ende eines jeden Monats – ohne jede Detailtiefe liefern. 

Einige der wichtigsten Bereiche, die ein Mandant typischerweise nachverfolgen möchte, sind: 

  • Kostenüberschreitungen gegenüber dem Budget/der Prognose 
  • Hohe Mengen einer einzelnen Art von Aktivität (z. B. Recherchen oder Entwürfe) 
  • Große Zeitspannen zwischen der durchgeführten Arbeit und den an den Mandanten eingereichten Zeiten/Honoraren. 

WIP-REPORTING BIETET AUCH KANZLEIEN MEHRWERTE 

Eines der Kernfunktionalitäten von Onit’s Legal Spend Management-Lösung BusyLamp eBilling.Space ist ein solches WIP-Reporting. Durch diese Funktion lässt sich die Beziehung zwischen Mandant und Kanzlei auf eine ganz neue Ebene heben. Einige der Vorteile des WIP-Reporting, die beide Parteien genießen, sind: 

  • Die Kanzlei liefert nebst hochwertiger Beratung einen weiteren Mehrwert in Form von verbesserten Abrechnungsdaten. 
  • Die Kanzlei hat die Gewissheit, dass die (bisher) geleistete Arbeit vom Mandanten akzeptiert wurde und es bei der Vorlage der Schlussrechnung keinen Push-Back geben wird. 
  • Der Mandant hat mehr Gewissheit, dass die Arbeit korrekt und im Einklang mit den Billing Guidelines durchgeführt wird. So kann schon früh ein Soll-Ist-Vergleich durchgeführt werden, um die Einhaltung des Budgets in allen Phasen der Transaktion sicherzustellen. 

HERAUSFORDERUNGEN DES WIP-REPORTINGS FÜR KANZLEIEN 

Trotz der Vorteile bringt ein WIP-Reporting auch gewisse Nachteile mit sich. Zwar erfüllen viele Kanzleien ihren Mandanten den Wunsch, zeitnahe und präzise WIP-Angaben zu übermitteln, einige wenige sträuben sich aber noch immer dagegen oder können die Anforderungen an WIP-Reporting einfach nicht erfüllen. 

Häufig sehen Kanzleien die “unverarbeiteten” WIP-Informationen als interne Daten an, die der Mandant nicht sehen sollte. Viele der großen internationalen Kanzleien setzen daher spezialisierte Revenue Controller ein, die innerhalb der juristischen Teams und eng mit den Deal-Partnern zusammenarbeiten. Solche Kanzleien haben auch gut etablierte Abrechnungsprozesse, bei denen die Mitarbeiter der Finanzabteilung und die Partner den WIP für jede Matter überprüfen, bevor die Rechnung fertiggestellt wird. Sie entscheiden, welche der erfassten Zeiten in Rechnung gestellt werden sollen. Noch wichtiger ist, dass sie auch überprüfen, ob die Zeitangaben angemessen formuliert und für den Mandanten geeignet sind. 

In den meisten Kanzleien werden die Anwälte hinsichtlich des Inhalts der Matter-Beschreibung beraten. Manche Projekte werden allerdings von mehreren hundert Associates gleichzeitig bearbeitet und es ist unmöglich zu überprüfen, was sie eingeben, bevor die Rechnungsdaten bereinigt werden. Die Kanzleien scheuen diesen Bereinigungsprozess (auch wenn es sich nur um eine kleine Anzahl von Rechnungen handelt), da die Partner dies als doppelte Arbeit ansehen. Außerdem möchte kein Partner der erste sein, der einem Mandanten die Einsicht in WIP-Daten erlaubt, falls diese unangemessene Inhalte enthalten. 

Ein weiterer Grund, der manchmal von Kanzleien angeführt wird, dreht sich um die zeitlichen und prozessualen Probleme, die mit WIP-Informationen verbunden sind. Genauer gesagt, was sind die Konsequenzen, wenn der Mandant einige oder sogar alle Informationen ablehnt? Einige Kanzleien argumentieren, dass, wenn WIP-Informationen erneut eingereicht werden müssen, die akzeptable Zeitspanne zwischen der Erledigung der Arbeit und ihrer Abrechnung überschritten werden kann. Sie versuchen oft, angemessene Zeitfenster und Prozesse für die Überprüfung und Wiedervorlage von WIP-Informationen festzulegen, für den Fall, dass Line Items nicht genehmigt werden. 

Ein letzter Einwand ist, dass die Erstellung von WIP-Dateien im LEDES-eBill-Format Entwicklungsarbeit erfordert, die vom Finanz-/IT-Team eingeplant werden muss. Manche Kanzleien haben manuelle Workarounds zur Unterstützung von WIP-Einreichungen implementiert, aber das ist auf Dauer und für eine wachsende Anzahl von Rechnungen nicht tragbar. 

WIE MAN DIE HERAUSFORDERUNGEN DES WIP-REPORTING ÜBERWINDET 

Anbieter von eBilling-Software, Mandanten wie auch Kanzleien, haben zusammen eine Reihe von Kompromissen als Lösungsansätze gefunden. Darunter: 

  • Positionserläuterungen: Parteien können vereinbaren, dass Line Items aus dem WIP-Upload gestrichen oder sie mit einem Platzhalter versehen werden. Letzterer könnte besagen, dass die Line Items nur auf der endgültigen Rechnung erscheinen. Wenn dies vereinbart wird, können die Mandanten zumindest die Kosten und die damit verbundenen Aktivitäten oder Ausgaben basierend auf dem LEDES-Code sehen (z. B. Kommunikation, Entwurf, Recherche usw.). 
  • Abrechnungszyklen und Abgrenzungen: Der Mandant kann ein ähnliches Ergebnis erzielen, wenn der Abrechnungszyklus auf einen Kalendermonat reduziert wird, sodass er einen Überblick über die Arbeit dieses Monats hat. Eine weitere Möglichkeit wäre, die als Abgrenzungen gelieferten Informationen zu verbessern. Dies würde dem Mandanten zwar nicht alle Zeitdetails liefern, aber einige der Anforderungen erfüllen. 
  • LEDES Anforderung: Um den Bedenken von Anwaltskanzleien über möglichen zusätzlichen IT-Entwicklungsaufwand zu begegnen, haben wir zwei alternative Methoden entwickelt, die im BusyLamp-Modul verwendet werden können: 
    • Kanzleien können ihre WIP-Informationen als Excel-Tabelle speichern, welche dann in BusyLamp hochgeladen werden kann. Da alle Kanzleien standardmäßig Zugang zu Excel haben, werden teure Änderungen am Abrechnungssystem minimiert. 
    • Die KI-Funktionalität in BusyLamp kann unstrukturierte WIP-Daten, die nicht im LEDES-Format vorliegen, in aussagekräftige und nützliche Reports extrahieren. 

Abschließend kann gesagt werden, dass für eine erfolgreiche Implementierung des WIP-Reports der Mandant frühzeitig mit den Partnern der Kanzlei zusammenarbeiten und die Anforderungen an das WIP-Reporting besprechen sollte. Dabei sollte geklärt werden, warum der Mandant WIP-Informationen benötigt und was er mit den Informationen erreichen möchte. Dies wird einige der Argumente entkräften, die gegen die Bereitstellung von WIP vorgebracht werden. Beiden Parteien wird so geholfen, geeignete Alternativen zu finden, die der Inhouse-Rechtsabteilung immer noch das geben, was sie für ihren Erfolg braucht. 

Englischer Original-Blog von Bryan King und übersetzt ins Deutsche