Category: Legal Operations

Legal Operations Innovators: A Conversation with Darren Guy of AIG

Raj Goyle, CEO of Bodhala, and Darren Guy, Chief Operating Officer of Global Legal, Compliance and Regulatory Affairs at AIG, sat down together – virtually, of course – to discuss his data journey at AIG and how Bodhala’s technology has empowered him to optimize spend and business operations.

Darren is the epitome of an innovator in the legal operations and spend management space, and we’re thrilled to be able to share his insights with you.

RG: Darren, thanks for taking the time to speak with me today. I’m excited to delve into the legal operations and data transformation you’ve led at AIG. Now, you’ve mentioned to me that when you arrived at AIG, the legal billing data was quite decentralized and bespoke? Is there a value that Bodhala now brings by centralizing and standardizing your data?

DG: Since arriving at AIG in early 2018, my team and I have worked diligently to revamp the foundations of our legal expense data analytics program while rebalancing our overall technology portfolio, enabling quicker management decisions and continued excellent legal outcomes, while bringing down total overall enterprise cost. We have combined internal “old school” finance techniques such as standard financial reporting and analysis discipline with more modern (and increasingly cheaper) SaaS-based external vendor data visualization applications (such as from your company), which allows our department to be more nimble and cost-effective. Bodhala has played an important role in these recent transformational efforts, as we continue to improve legal expense efficiency and performance through improved data visualization efforts.

We had been creating reports before Bodhala, but due to somewhat decentralized operational processes that created inconsistent data elements, it was extremely difficult (and time consuming) to make sense of our data in a timely fashion. Legal costs, particularly legal claims litigation expenses, play an integral role in the bottom line of any insurance company. It’s imperative our leaders have the best quality data as soon as reasonably possible in order to make proactive case management decisions. If you’re unable to quickly identify meaningful data trends and anomalies in your business lines, that can translate into significant missed opportunities for any company. 

Bodhala’s anomaly detection and data visualization capabilities help me bring a bunch of disparate data sources together to make better sense of our management information. By cleansing and restructuring our data, Bodhala has allowed us to reset and improve our reporting and analysis deliverables for my corporate legal and claims colleagues, fueling more consistent and proactive management decisions.

RG: How do you approach change management in such a large organization that might be set in its ways?

DG: I think change management has been the hardest part of my job — much more difficult than procuring different technology solutions or creating new policies. But that’s not exclusive to AIG by any means. Insurance is a very established industry with norms that can be hard to break. 

As we seek to improve data analytics capabilities at such a large organization with a long history of doing things a certain way, we are increasingly mindful of the importance of effective overall operational procedures and strong data governance policy. Data visualization programs are more successful when working in tandem with consistent procedures that produce common data elements. If you don’t have effective operational “golden rules” that govern your key data elements, any corporate technology application will struggle to be successful (i.e., the often-used analogy about garbage in, garbage out).

RG: What has been your primary tactic with your team in order to build an effective legal operations function? 

Since my arrival at the beginning of 2018, I’ve spent a significant amount of time promoting cross-training and collaboration opportunities within our AIG Legal Operations team so everyone understands all of the important functions of legal operations as a business; not only how they can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our AIG Legal Compliance, Regulatory and Government Affairs/Public Policy team, but also how our hard work contributes to solving some complex problems for AIG in a way that minimizes risk while improving financial performance. As I’ve said many times to our employees internally, we only have one stock price. 

RG: The word “relationship” has been overused to stand as a proxy for economic and business value. The question we’re asked all the time is – how does the use of data in your industry affect the “relationship” with a law firm? How do you handle that?

DG: Meaningful data visualization techniques (i.e., presenting management information in a clean and easy to digest fashion) is key to having real and robust periodic conversations with your law firm strategic partners. Note I said strategic partner, not vendor, as we are not buying pencils here; rather, we are cultivating significant enterprise relationships and so a variety of both quantitative and qualitative metrics can support meaningful discussions about what is working well with a particular firm, or perhaps identifying areas where adjustments may be needed.  It is important to conduct a healthy dialogue and share an honest assessment of the overall value a firm brings to your company, and Bodhala helps us do that by presenting information from disparate data sets in a clean and professional manner. Bodhala’s Firm Report Cards provide a centralized snapshot of our top matters, top billing rates, and discounts, partner/associate staffing ratios, plus a host of other metrics/KPIs as defined by us. 

We get more out of these meetings in terms of real two-way constructive feedback when we can demonstrate command of the KPIs/metrics via effective data visualization approaches, which allows us to pivot to more constructive and impactful conversations about effective case management strategies and outcome-based value pricing techniques. If you don’t have an accurate understanding of “time value of money” economic concepts for your legal matter portfolio, it is hard to drive real efficiencies in your organization through pricing modernization. 

RG: We run into potential customers who think they don’t need Bodhala because they have an eBilling system in place. AIG uses both – can you explain how your eBiller and Bodhala work together? 

DG: EBilling applications are important and necessary, but in my opinion, are increasingly “table stakes” in an organization, as they are still just a collection of flat files heavily dependent on law firm billing accuracy and consistency. Bodhala can be a more dynamic addition to your technology portfolio, with its proprietary Hercules engine cleansing eBilling or other key department data, acting as a reporting “turbocharger” of sorts for an organization, providing usable analytics required to run a data-driven legal business. The ability to cleanse and restructure information can be critical for a larger organization still in the journey of cleaning up decentralized matter management practices. One other big advantage is the ability to enrich e-standard eBilling data with meta/contextual data from other sources and have it analyzed in one place. It gets us closer to truly understanding the “why” instead of the “what just happened”, which can lead to better intelligence and ultimately better pricing.

Also, as the costs of technology applications decrease significantly due to SaaS-solutions in the Cloud, companies can now rebalance their total technology portfolios in a way where they can spend less on their technology portfolio overall while adding more advanced (but complementary) anomaly-detection data visualization products such as Bodhala to their eBilling applications, while also separately investing in more workflow tools for Legal attorneys and Compliance professionals. In short, as costs have come down, we’ve been able to provide more smart technology solutions to our customers. I expect peer companies of our size will ultimately take advantage of both eBilling and advanced analytics platforms in the future. 

RG: Could you manage your department at scale without Bodhala?

DG: Of course. We could get the same metrics and measures without Bodhala, but it would take us more time and would require more resources. We can scale much more quickly with Bodhala. We help manage a significant amount of legal spend in our portfolio across many insurance business lines, so for me, managing every available expense lever appropriately is like a giant Rubik’s Cube, and it takes every forward-thinking tool in our toolbox – and that’s why we ultimately decided to add Bodhala to our product mix. Our ultimate goal is to help our attorneys manage our legal matters in the most efficient and effective way possible, and Bodhala helps me and my team do that by augmenting our data analytics program in a way that appropriately balances legal risk with economic discipline. Our legal operations mission is to always find the best combination of “right firm, right price”, leading to the optimal outcome for AIG and its insureds.

RG: If you found someone who is beginning their legal operations journey, what advice would you share with them?

DG: First, surround yourself with people who are energetic, intelligent and inquisitive, with expertise in a variety of areas (e.g., finance, operations, IT, project management, information management, administration) who can help you manage the business of law. 

Next, create an effective working partnership between legal and finance, as soon as you can. I think a lot of companies overlook that portion of the legal operations job. And don’t underestimate the role that proactive communication and expense transparency play with your internal corporate and business partners, and how that translates into improved collaboration and trust throughout your organization. No shocker here, but business folks are full of numbers people, and they simply want to be included in what’s going on. A good legal operations liaison should be able to effectively communicate how your company is proactively balancing both external and internal resources and expense ratios to manage one of the biggest and most volatile expense lines at the company. Communicating the value of the legal team using clear and concise data is critical to maintaining credibility and enhancing the legal department’s reputation within an organization.

But regardless of your industry, don’t shy away from advances being made in data sciences and information management. Because at the end of the day, isn’t the entire goal of Legal Operations to present information to management in a way that helps efficiently solve complex problems? Use it to drive efficiency, to increase the speed of management decisions, and ultimately to demonstrate to your organization that you’re getting the most value from every dollar that is spent on behalf of legal services.

Get in touch with our team of legal billing and data experts to find out how Bodhala can transform your legal department.

Bodhala Named Winner of Legal Spend Management Innovation of the Year

We’re excited to announce that Bodhala was selected as the winner of the ‘Legal Spend Management Innovation of the Year’ award in the 2020 LegalTech Breakthrough Awards

LegalTech Breakthrough is a leading independent market intelligence organization that evaluates and recognizes standout technology companies, products, and services throughout the globe. The LegalTech Breakthrough Awards honor excellence and recognize innovation, hard work, and success in a range of LegalTech categories.

“Bodhala’s technology solutions are driving innovation in the industry by helping legal departments find the right lawyer at the right law firm at the right price.”

– Bryan Vaughn, Managing Director of the LegalTech Breakthrough Awards.

We are extremely proud and humbled to be recognized as a leader and innovator in legal spend management. We look forward to helping more organizations improve their strategic spending by bringing rigor and sophistication to their legal spend management processes.  

To learn more, please read the full press release here.

Get in touch with our team of legal billing and data experts to find out how Bodhala can transform your legal department.

Law Firm Diversity is Told by Ownership, Not Pitch Decks and Pro Bono Work

The changing nature of law firm business models has left many general counsels in the dark when it comes to understanding who at their law firm is being rewarded for the dollars being spent with the firm.

In fact, a recent survey of general counsels and senior in-house lawyers found that over half of the respondents were completely unaware of how origination credit is awarded. 

Given origination credit is the largest factor driving ownership stakes at law firms, this statistic is alarming. 

But it’s particularly alarming considering that our latest report found that the average number of Black equity partners at elite law firms was just 1.84% in 2019. A less than one percent increase from where that number stood in 1991.

This lack of awareness by general counsels is detrimental to Black and other underrepresented attorneys that often get snubbed from origination credit. All too often the credit for client acquisition is “already spoken for”, resulting in lower compensation for the attorney and oftentimes, prompts the attorney to leave the firm altogether. 

Clients – corporate legal departments – have the power to change this narrative. Data is helping drive the charge.

It’s increasingly important to companies that their vendors reflect their values – especially when it comes to diversity. But to ensure real progress among minority partners and associates, clients need to understand the implications of origination credit and the negative role it plays in holding back minority lawyers from achieving equity partner status.

Origination credit should not be doled out based on internal political games – though that is precisely how it is most often done. It should be consciously allocated by a client who clearly communicates which partners they consider core to the relationship.

Corporate legal departments keep BigLaw alive, yet most underestimate their leverage. Companies must hold their law firms accountable for how partners are compensated and how they prioritize diversity initiatives.

GCs, DGCs, and their teams must evaluate which partners are important to their portfolio of work, determine whether or not their firms are seeking out or nurturing minority partners, and monitor whether those partners are actually getting origination credit for the large sums of money being spent with the firm. If not, in order to promote real progress in diversity, companies must be willing to walk away. 

These aren’t always easy conversations to have, but they’re necessary to drive change and create a system in which minority lawyers can thrive. 

To help you get started, we have created a free template letter that corporate legal departments can utilize to kick off the conversation on diversity with their law firms. Download your free origination credit letter template today!

Get in touch with our team of legal billing and data experts to find out how Bodhala can transform your legal department.

Bodhala Recognized as Emerging Startup of Legal Tech

We are excited to announce that Tracxn has recognized Bodhala as an “Emerging Startup of Legal Tech”. Tracxn is a leading technology platform trusted by VC, PE, M&A, and Innovation teams to track startups and private companies across over 500 sectors.

Tracxn’s Emerging Startups Awards acknowledges a carefully curated list of high growth and high potential companies that are making an impact in the legal tech sector. Companies are selected based on a multitude of criteria including market size, investment by marquee investors, execution excellence, and future growth prospects.

Bodhala was recognized  as a “Minicorn” – a high growth, early-stage startup taking business to the next level by scaling up for accelerated growth. 

Following our $10M Series A funding this past April, Bodhala continues to grow rapidly both in headcount and customers, serving leading companies in private equity, insurance, and financial services.

To check out the complete list of honorees, click here.

Get in touch with our team of legal billing and data experts to find out how Bodhala can transform your legal department.

Legal Economics: Innovation Driver or Oxymoron?

Not all in-house lawyers handle discovery work. But the reality is that every in-house lawyer needs to take on some discovery work, no matter their area of expertise. Price discovery, that is.

The opacity of the legal services market has led corporations – especially large ones – to be routinely overcharged by their AmLaw 200 outside counsel. Not only are corporations being overcharged, their firms’ rates are growing year-over-year at an unprecedented rate. To put it in perspective, only healthcare premiums have grown more rapidly — with legal nipping at their heels. 

But why? The answer is simple: the legal services market is not an efficient economic market. In fact, you’d be hard-pressed to classify it as a functional economic market at all.

Economics 101

Governed by supply and demand, a functional market economy is squarely grounded by the ability for participants to have price discovery. This allows them to assign a value to the product or service they want to purchase – and determine if the price matches that value. 

This isn’t rocket science. This concept is implicitly understood by everyone — whether they know it or not. And yet despite being a long-standing profession central to the economy, there is no true price discovery for legal services. Buyers cannot assess price in terms of value (perceived or otherwise). They cannot compare their options. Competition is restricted. It’s a mess – a mess that buyers of legal services have to wade through constantly, trying to make the best of it. 

As a result, in-house teams are left at the mercy of their law firms who cite the prestige of their brand and established client relationships as justification for their ever-increasing legal fees. In-house legal teams have little choice but to build “partnerships” with outside counsel and trust that those firms are doing right by them. 

How good is your “good deal”?

Law firms might insist you’re getting the best price – better than everyone else – but can they prove it? Rate discussions often leave in-house teams feeling uneasy and left wondering if they’re really getting as good of a deal as law firms claim – or if law firm antics are at play. 

Law firms obsess over their realization rates. So if you’ve come to an agreement on rates and think you’re getting a good deal, chances are you’re not receiving any deal at all. Why? Because law firms will do everything in their power to manipulate the realization rate for their benefit. By jacking up the number of hours recorded to yield a higher realization rate, law firms give themselves an unwarranted raise year over year.

While it has made things complicated and costly for the buy-side, law firms have thrived on the fogginess of the legal “market”. Even when met with indisputable data and pushback from their client, a leading partner at an elite law firm claimed that they could not believe the data. An for what reason? Simply because other clients were paying the firm’s rack rates, proving that “invisible hand of the market” was at play. The murky relationship between price and value and the lack of true competition on much else other than brand and reputation has certainly padded their wallets.

But despite their hefty bank accounts, it isn’t all roses and lollipops for law firms either. The lack of price discovery in the market has its ramifications for firms, directly correlating with their constant pushback on technology and change.

If no one forces you to change, why change?

The constant influx of cash incentivizes firms to maintain the status quo, stifling competition, and cutting innovation off at the knees. To say that the legal industry is in the late majority of technology adoption would be generous – they’re laggards. This has allowed new business models to start infringing on traditional law firm turf. 

Seeing an efficiency gap and firms’ unwillingness to innovate, ALSPs (Alternative Legal Services Providers) have not only cropped up but gained mainstream acceptance. Tasks – and some types of matters – that used to be billable hours for law firms are now being allocated to faster, more cost-efficient resources. 

Pressure for accountability

The gravity of market inefficiency has been heightened recently due to the global economic crisis caused by Covid-19. Historically, top tier firms have continued to enjoy constant and sometimes accelerated growth during economic downturns. But with balance sheets under more scrutiny than ever, legal spend is starting to be examined in earnest. 

GCs and CFOs across industries can no longer afford to tolerate idle price-taker behavior. 

C-suite mandates to cut costs are straining internal relationships between legal and finance, forcing legal departments to find opportunities for potential savings in each line item of their budgets. Law firm relationships are no exception. 

It’s fair to say that the legal services market is broken, hurting on both the buy- and sell-side. Corporate legal departments are saddled with year over year rate hikes well above inflation, without the tools they need to understand the value they’re getting. Work that used to constitute billable hours for law firms is being siphoned off to more economical service providers.  Overpriced and stagnant.  But does it have to be that way? 

Data: The key to a level playing-field

The simple answer is, no. There’s a treasure chest just around the corner — full of 0’s and 1’s. No, it’s not a special edition of Lucky Charms. It’s data. 

Data has the power to turn in-house teams from price-takers to price-makers. Data puts them in the driver’s seat, giving them the transparency they need to understand the value they’re getting from their firms and optimize from there – be it with rates, efficiency, or stewardship. 

Based on Bodhala platform analytics, our legal experts predict that in-house teams have the opportunity to realize between 15-30% in savings by leveraging their own data. Data is the key to unlocking competitive, market-based rates. But to truly understand if those rates are delivering the value necessary to justify the price, companies need evidence. Data is that evidence.

The legal services market is one in which nearly all buyers underestimate their leverage. In-house teams have the ability to drive real change and break through the status quo on everything from fair market pricing to increasing diversity in the industry. The buy-side is now in a position to use data to incentivize accountability and innovation from the sell-side. If your firms don’t fight for your business by pushing themselves to change, then they’re not a critical partner to your business. 

The reluctance to provide transparency and adopt technology has created a distinct advantage for the sell-side. Continuing down that path puts industry incumbents in a precarious position. 

Disruption is already here for the legal services industry. We need a functional, transparent market for legal services. Advocating for transparency and the active use of data will be the difference between those who succeed in riding the wave of change, and those who drown fighting the tide. 

The question is this: Will you embrace data and transparency before it’s too late?

Get in touch with our team of legal billing and data experts to find out how Bodhala can transform your legal department.

Turn Your eBilling Data into Strategic Planning Gold

eBilling systems are expensive. And while necessary, they can entangle legal departments in a web of data that is difficult to unpack – and even harder to leverage for analysis and optimization. 

From insurance to financial services and private equity, Bodhala has seen corporate legal departments invest millions of dollars in eBillers with the intention to not only simplify paying their bills, but also to support data-driven decision making. Unfortunately those investments are often hampered by serious issues, including gaps in legal billing data (e.g. classification conflicts on firms, practice areas and matter-types) and the subsequent inability to cluster matters and tasks accurately. 

If you use an eBilling system, here are some familiar laments:

  • A top private equity firm could not rely on their eBiller for clean data to support strategic decisions
  • A Fortune 20 company’s eBiller actually set them behind on departmental goals due to a sheer lack of efficiency and reliable reports
  • A major bank spent four years and over $3 million to implement a data visualization tool on top of their eBiller, but have yet to see any ROI

These pain points are not the result of not having the “right” eBiller. Data issues are at the core of every eBiller. To maximize your eBilling investment, it’s vital to have an analytics layer that leverages actionable insights.

Legal-specific analytics solutions, like Bodhala, can work in conjunction with your eBiller to exponentially increase the value of your investment. Instead of spending countless hours buried in layers of spreadsheets, legal analytics tools can surface your spend narrative in a matter of seconds — enabling your team to quickly deliver value on mission-critical work.

Forward-thinking legal departments have realized that eBillers and legal analytics tools are not one and the same. Here are just some of the benefits of using legal analytics software in unison with your eBiller: 

  1. Data Accuracy Do you really trust your eBilling data? When it comes to data, most legal departments trust legal spend analytics far more than eBillers. That said, many legal analytics tools simply ingest the bad data directly from an eBiller, resulting in the same issues. It’s critical that your legal analytics tool cleanse, transform and organize your data on ingest. Without apples-to-apples comparisons, it’s impossible to get the strategic insight necessary for better decisions.
  2. Strategic DecisionseBillers show costs by invoice. Analytics solutions free you from the invoice, allowing you to realign your thinking around matter-types, practice areas and law firms. By leveling up your view, you have visibility into the things that truly impact strategic decisions, enable better firm management on everything from rates to quality.
  3. ROIeBillers are a significant investment, which makes the frustration about getting accurate data even more vexing. 90% of Bodhala clients use our platform in conjunction with their eBiller in order to increase time-to-value, optimize spend and realize ROI – all things they were unable to do with their eBiller alone.

As companies grapple to get a hold of their legal spend and budget ahead of a new fiscal year, the need for data and actionable insights has never been more urgent. Analytics tools, like Bodhala, can enhance your eBilling investments and turn your data into strategic planning gold.

Get in touch with our team of legal billing and data experts to find out how Bodhala can transform your legal department.

Heads The Lawyer Wins, Tails the Lawyer Wins

Earlier this week Bodhala CEO, Raj Goyle, joined the “Eye on the Industry” podcast hosted by Jon Cooper, CEO of Industrial Exchange, to discuss Big Law’s Lebron James problem. Because of the opacity of the market, law firms are able to price lawyers as if everybody is LeBron, but data can change this.

“There’s an old saying in the law – if you flip a coin – heads the lawyer wins, tails the lawyer wins.” 

Take a listen to learn more!

Get in touch with our team of legal billing and data experts to find out how Bodhala can transform your legal department.

Bodhala CEO, Raj Goyle, Discusses Legal Billing Opacity on Nasdaq Trade Talks

This week Bodhala CEO, Raj Goyle, sat down with Nasdaq Trade Talks host, Jill Malandrino, to talk about the opacity of the legal services market. Covering everything from the role data plays in legal spend optimization to how Covid-19 is affecting the legal landscape, it’s a great listen.

“We believe in the very important relationships and collaborations between our clients and their outside law firms, but we also believe that there’s a market that must exist so therefore those services can be valued and optimized.”

– Raj Goyle, Bodhala CEO & Co-Founder

Check it out!

How to Move from Price-Taker to Price-Maker in Law Firm Relationships

Bombarded with law firm rate increases? Think twice before giving your law firm what they want.

The past year has brought unprecedented uncertainty to economies around the globe. Most businesses have been dramatically impacted, leaving their bottom lines in far different shape than last year. Along with financial instability comes the pressure to cut costs and evaluate each budget line item with heightened scrutiny. Your law firms’ rates should be no exception.

Historically, law firms have sheltered themselves from the crushing economic impact of past crises — even profiting in some instances — all while the companies they serve suffer. Though you might view certain firms as paramount to your business, complying with rate increases that reflect above-market fees shouldn’t be a knee-jerk reaction…especially during a global pandemic.

Regardless of how effectively your legal department has operated in the past, it’s clear we all need to rethink our strategy going forward. There’s no time like the present to determine what brings value to your business and what’s draining your bottom line. 

  • Reducing cost expenditures in the short and long-term
  • Identifying the key firms who are willing to lean-in and share in the economic burden

It’s time to move from a reactive state to a proactive state when it comes to law firm pricing.

There’s just one way to get there — data.

Shed your reputation as an idle price-taker. Sophisticated legal-tech solutions, like Bodhala, offer data-backed insights that can strengthen your negotiation power with your law firms. 

By leveraging data, legal departments can surface granular analyses of their spend and insights on how their law firms’ rates stack up against others in the market to keep their rate increases in check. 

Don’t have the data to execute this just yet? We’re here to help.

Bodhala recommends requesting a 15-20% discount from your law firms on all work executed throughout the duration of the Covid-19 crisis. 

In addition to aiding your cash conservation efforts, this request allows your legal department to identify which firms are truly critical partners for your business. Which law firms are willing to put their egos – and paychecks – aside to help their clients in an urgent time of need? 

Download our free rate negotiation letter template to kickstart the conversation with your law firm.

Get in touch with our team of legal billing and data experts to find out how Bodhala can transform your legal department.